Abdullah — Peel Journal

Undoing Guggenheim:

Intervention Through Omission Answered by Abdullah Maddan

Embracing uncertainty and drawing inspiration from the works of artists like Gordon Matta-Clark and Chris Burden, our approach delves into experimentation and study through physical models of concrete slabs. Inspired by Matta-Clark’s deconstructive interventions and Burden’s daring performances, we challenge conventional notions of stability and form in architectural design. By subjecting concrete slabs to deliberate acts of breaking and reinforcing, we explore the dynamic interplay between strength and vulnerability, order and chaos. These heroic acts of creation and destruction generate high energy and attention, captivating both participants and observers alike. Through these experiments, we seek not only to uncover unexpected aesthetic expressions but also to interrogate the material properties of concrete and the structural principles that govern it. In embracing uncertainty, we open ourselves to the possibility of discovery, pushing the boundaries of conventional design methodologies to forge new paths of creative exploration.

Navigating the complexities of intervention and mitigating the potential for iatrogenics often leads us to consider the power of omission. From a skeptical stance regarding the limitations of human knowledge, grasping control over outcomes within intricate systems proves challenging. The Guggenheim, operating as a complex ecosystem, underscores this challenge. Rather than assertive manipulation, our approach hinges on strategic omissions, recognizing that attempts at improvement may inadvertently trigger unforeseen consequences. By carefully selecting where and when to intervene, we aim to navigate the intricacies of the Guggenheim's ecosystem, fostering progress while minimizing the risk of unintended side effects.